Your RoofIQ Risk Assessment
A reconciled picture of your HVAC fleet across 28 Florida Taco Bell locations — three sources cross-checked, every dollar of three-plus years of work-order history modeled, and a fixed-price program built around the result.
Three sources, one reconciled fleet.
Your ServiceTitan history showed one picture. Our RoofIQ aerial survey showed another. We reconciled both into a single, audit-trail-clean view of what's actually on your roofs — then ran every work order from the past three-plus years against it. This analysis and proposal cover BDE's 28 Tampa Bay metro locations only; the Orlando-area locations are excluded from scope.
A full and reconciled view of every roof.
Every number downstream is anchored on a register cross-checked across your historical service data, what aerial survey verified on the roof, and what your live monitoring platform reports.
28 locations. 103 priceable assets.
The asset register was built from three sources: ServiceTitan for your equipment registry and work-order history, RoofIQ aerial survey for what's physically on each roof, and Monaire for continuous runtime and fault data on the RTU and refrigeration fleet.
Older units cost more to keep running.
Left: how the 47 RTUs in your ServiceTitan registry split by age. Right: the typical annual reactive spend per RTU for a QSR rooftop unit in each age band — Scription's benchmark range across comparable fleets. The marker on each bar shows where BDE's own per-unit spend lands. BDE's units track right inside the benchmark, and the cost climbs with every age band — a unit in the 7–9yr range costs roughly a third more per year than a new one, and that climb steepens past 10 years.
Three locations carry 27% of your spend.
Cumulative reactive spend with every location ranked highest-cost first. The closer the curve bows toward the upper-left, the more concentrated your risk. BDE's curve is moderate — your spend is real but spread broadly. Three locations dominate; eleven carry roughly two-thirds.
Per-location cumulative spend distribution
Where the dollars actually went.
Each cell is real spend from your ServiceTitan history. Locations are ranked by total reactive cost, and bucketed by per-WO ticket size. The hotter the red, the larger the individual events. Toggle between 2024 and 2025 and you'll see the heat shift right in the cells — more spend landing in the larger ticket-size bands year over year, which means more high-severity repairs as the fleet ages.
Four forces shaping your next 24 months.
Each is observable in BDE's data or in the operating environment around it. Each compounds the others. The reactive line has held flat for three years on capex you've already deployed — these are the pressures pushing against that.
Aging equipment costs more, every year
Across BDE's own data, the climb is already visible: locations with 0–3yr equipment averaged $3.9K/yr in reactive spend, 4–6yr averaged $4.2K/yr, and 7–9yr averaged $5.2K/yr. That's a real ~33% increase in just six years of age — and it's tracking equipment your registry knows about.
Service costs only go up.
Outside of PMs and capex investment, every force acting on a reactive service bill pushes it higher. R-410A refrigerant has been under EPA production restriction since January 2025, and allocations stepped down again in 2026 — installed pricing has roughly doubled in three years. The bigger near-term issue for BDE is evaporator and condenser coils — the coils across your fleet aren't standard off-the-shelf items, which means longer lead times, more shopping per repair, and tech time spent waiting for parts that aren't on the truck.
And the cost of each call keeps climbing.
The bill for any given reactive event is a stack of layered increases. Some you can model; some you can't.
Heat is the constant stressor. Storms are the punctuation.
The fleet runs at full cooling load ~8 months a year in Tampa Bay. 2026 is forecast hotter than normal; the hurricane season slightly below average — but BDE knows what "below average" looks like in practice.
Protect the investment you've already made
BDE has already deployed $706K in unit replacements over 3.4 years — including the major 2024 refreshes at #30370 St. Petersburg (York → Trane, Aug 2024) and #31597 Tampa (York → Trane, Nov 2024). That capex did real work: it's the reason your reactive line tracks a near-flat ~$116K/yr instead of climbing the way an unrenovated fleet would. Capex slowed the bleed. It didn't stop it, and it never can.
Where this lands — and what locks it down.
The cards below show the dollar exposure under four scenarios for the next 12 months — anchored on June 2026 to June 2027, the fiscal window the coverage decision actually applies to. Beneath them, the seven-year fan shows how those four percentiles widen as uncertainty compounds. The Scription program rate sits inside the bottom of the P25 band and grows at CPI on renewal — capped, predictable, and well below the median.
Annual reactive spend — seven-year percentile fan
A predictable number. Locked in.
2026 program rate: $124K, fixed for the year — all-in on reactive component repairs, billed quarterly. Replacement decisions stay with BDE.
quarterly billing · no deductible
median climbs to ~$175K by 2029 as aging and parts compound
Let's walk through this together.
Thirty minutes with Gerritt to walk the findings, answer questions on the program terms, and align on a path from signed proposal to coverage going live.